Welcome to GUBU.ie - lurkers are obviously welcome but please consider joining in the discussion!! Register here to create an account and start posting.
Threadban immigration thread
Threadban immigration thread
I accept I replied to a poster when I had been asked not to, so the threadban is fair enough, I was wrong and accept it.
I would like to point out that the particular poster appears to be replying to my posts, when quoting other people. As some type of get around. Is this permissable?
I would like to point out that the particular poster appears to be replying to my posts, when quoting other people. As some type of get around. Is this permissable?
Re: Threadban immigration thread
Can you link an example, thanks?Bubblypop wrote: ↑Thu Oct 30, 2025 10:56 am I accept I replied to a poster when I had been asked not to, so the threadban is fair enough, I was wrong and accept it.
I would like to point out that the particular poster appears to be replying to my posts, when quoting other people. As some type of get around. Is this permissable?
Re: Threadban immigration thread
I have lifted the threadban. Please just stay out of each others way. thanks.
-
ceannairceach
- Posts: 733
- Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2025 3:48 pm
Re: Threadban immigration thread
I have to respectfully register my displeasure this has caused.
I noted a comment in a reply from I think Jequon?
I commented on an inconsistency in terminology. I had no idea who posted the original and had I saw who it was would have thought twice about my comment and I have zero wish to engage.
Whereas on a third occasion now Bubblypop has contravened a direct instruction and gets away with it - adding to the many breaches of the basic cardinal rule.
I’m tired of being dragged into this as it made to look like I am continuing a pointless argument. I’m not looking for a “workaround”. I have no wish to engage full stop let alone find a way.
I noted a comment in a reply from I think Jequon?
I commented on an inconsistency in terminology. I had no idea who posted the original and had I saw who it was would have thought twice about my comment and I have zero wish to engage.
Whereas on a third occasion now Bubblypop has contravened a direct instruction and gets away with it - adding to the many breaches of the basic cardinal rule.
I’m tired of being dragged into this as it made to look like I am continuing a pointless argument. I’m not looking for a “workaround”. I have no wish to engage full stop let alone find a way.
Re: Threadban immigration thread
As I said, just err on the side of caution, thanks.ceannairceach wrote: ↑Thu Oct 30, 2025 12:25 pm I have to respectfully register my displeasure this has caused.
I noted a comment in a reply from I think Jequon?
I commented on an inconsistency in terminology. I had no idea who posted the original and had I saw who it was would have thought twice about my comment and I have zero wish to engage.
Whereas on a third occasion now Bubblypop has contravened a direct instruction and gets away with it - adding to the many breaches of the basic cardinal rule.
I’m tired of being dragged into this as it made to look like I am continuing a pointless argument. I’m not looking for a “workaround”. I have no wish to engage full stop let alone find a way.
-
ceannairceach
- Posts: 733
- Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2025 3:48 pm
Re: Threadban immigration thread
I absolutely respect that but like I said I’ve not violated the instruction nor have I sought to violate it, and note it is site wide of course.
I will show caution but I just wanted it on the record that breaches are not equal.
Re: Threadban immigration thread
I am going to be blunt here, for clarity. I wish occasionally you could try see things from different point of view other than your own, particularly mine trying to mod your posts and keep the peace.ceannairceach wrote: ↑Fri Oct 31, 2025 11:06 am I absolutely respect that but like I said I’ve not violated the instruction nor have I sought to violate it, and note it is site wide of course.
I will show caution but I just wanted it on the record that breaches are not equal.
This is clearly bullshit, yet you were given the benefit of the doubt in the hope you could just drop it and move on. And here you are, still having a whinge about the unfairness of it all.ceannairceach wrote: ↑Thu Oct 30, 2025 12:25 pm I commented on an inconsistency in terminology. I had no idea who posted the original and had I saw who it was would have thought twice about my comment and I have zero wish to engage.
Over 75% of the modding here involves you, directly or indirectly, and it is becoming an issue. You seem very keen to pick a fight with anybody who doesn't see things exactly the same way as you, including me, and I am getting sick of it.